Research Article - (2024) Volume 15, Issue 1

GC-MS, GNPS and METLIN Assisted Phytochemical Profiling, Bioactivity Study and Molecular Docking Analysis of Paropsia brazzeana Root Bark, a Medicinal Plant in Zambia

Indra Sen Singh* and Sidney Muzyamba
 
*Correspondence: Indra Sen Singh, Department of Chemistry, School of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zimbabwe, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

Medicinal plants have been used in Zambia as folk medicine from time immemorial. Ethnopharmacological studies have indicated that various parts of Paropsia brazzeana have been used to treat various ailments such as Venereal Diseases (VD), gastrointestinal complications, malaria, hernia, and toothaches while also possessing antibacterial, antispasmodic, antiamoebic activity and aphrodisiac potential. In the present study, we report the qualitative phytochemical screening, Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) phytochemical profiling, Global Natural Product Social (GNPS) and (METLIN) Gen 2 Database assisted molecular mining, total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, in vitro antioxidant activity of crude root bark extract, and molecular docking analysis of selected phytochemicals of Paropsia brazzeana. Qualitative phytochemical screening revealed the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, carbohydrates, tannins, terpenoids, and steroids. Phytochemical profiling revealed the presence of therapeutic compounds such as d-allose, vanillic acid, 2,5-diphenyloxazole, linoelaidic acid, beta-sitosterol, and many other molecules. Total phenol content was estimated to be 403.7165 ± 6.4771 mg GAE/kg, while total flavonoid content was found to be 587.15 ± 2.4768 mg QE/kg. The root bark extract of P. brazzeana showed strong antioxidative potential with IC50 value of 42.37 mg/l, while for ascorbic acid (standard), IC50 was 23.19 mg/l. Furthermore, the identified compounds could potentially have anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, anti-obesity, anti-fungal, anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory properties while also having the ability to ease cramps, and thus it can be used as a potential nutraceutical. Molecular docking analysis and its results indicated that beta-sitosterol outperformed the anti-inflammatory drug, ibuprofen when bound to the Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) enzyme. With a binding energy of -11.43 kcal/mole and an inhibition constant of 4.18 nM, beta-sitosterol exhibited stronger binding affinity, outperforming Ibuprofen, which displayed a binding energy of -6.88 kcal/mole and an inhibition constant of 9.10 µM. Consequently, beta-sitosterol emerges as a promising candidate for further investigations in anti-inflammatory drug development. The findings of this study are promising for advancing future drug development initiatives.

Keywords

Antioxidant, Paropsia brazzeana, Quercetin, Total flavonoid content, Total phenol content

Introduction

Humankind has used medicinal herbs to treat or prevent diseases for thousands of years (Belhaj MR, et al., 2021). These herbs contain pharmacologically active secondary metabolites, which benefit humans and animals (Kamboj VP, 2000). Extensive in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated the potential of phytochemicals like alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids, tannins, terpenoids, and others found in medicinal plants to treat various health issues and relieve pain (Sharma A, et al., 2008). For example, animal experiments have shown that naturally occurring monoterpenoids in plants can influence heart rate, blood vessels (both myogenic and endothelium-mediated), Systemic Blood Pressure (SBP), and exhibit properties such as anticancer, anti-viral, gastroprotective, vasorelaxant, antinociceptive, antispasmodic, and antidiabetic effects (Paduch R, et al., 2007; Edris AE, 2007; Vasconcelos CM, et al., 2018; Maia-Joca RP, et al., 2014; Cardoso-Teixeira AC, et al., 2018).

Many antioxidants, both synthetic and natural, are available. Antioxidants are classified as molecules that can terminate free radicals either by stalling or blocking the oxidation of oxidizable materials by essentially donating an electron to reactive species while eventually stabilizing themselves (Dai J and Mumper RJ, 2010). Oxidative stress generally occurs when there is a mismatch between free radicals and antioxidants in the body (Shigenaga MK, et al., 1994). Whenever there is an imbalance, free radicals can begin harming the adipose tissue, DNA, and proteins in the body when there are more of them than can be controlled by antioxidants. A growing body of knowledge has indicated that free radicals are heavily involved in many health complications such as diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, cancer, aging, neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson and many more (Shigenaga MK, et al., 1994).

Paropsia brazzeana is a member of the family Passifloraceae, locally known as ‘Nshimonamatako’ because of its aphrodisiac potential. The plant is one of the most commonly used medicinal plants in many parts of Zambia (Maroyi A, 2022). This multistemmed shrub is also known to occur in other African countries such as Congo, Namibia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Angola, Botswana, and Zimbabwe (Maroyi A, 2022). Ethnopharmacological studies have indicated that various parts of the plant, namely; leaves, leaf sap, root, fruit, root bark, and stem bark have been decocted and used to treat various ailments such as Venereal Diseases (VD), gastrointestinal complications, malaria, hernia, and toothaches while also possessing antibacterial, antispasmodic, and anti-amoebic activity (Maroyi A, 2022).

Molecular docking has gained widespread recognition as an important tool in drug discovery, primarily due to its relatively low cost and the perception of its ease of use. This has fueled its growing popularity among researchers. Molecular docking simulation is an in-silico method that belongs to the Structure-Based Drug Design (SBDD), typically utilized to get information on the optimal docked ligand poses to create stable complexes with the target. The widespread medicinal use of the plant under consideration motivated for molecular docking analysis of some molecules identified in the plant sample.

GC-MS and Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC- MS-MS) phytochemical screening is accelerating natural products research. Recent advances in natural product research include the advent of MZmine 3 and subsequent structural annotations using GNPS and METLIN tools. Some recent studies using these techniques yielded significant results (Allah AA, et al., 2023; Chibuye B, et al., 2023; Bitwell C, et al., 2023). This study aimed at evaluating the scientific credence of Paropsia brazzeana Baill root bark extracts (Passifloraceae) by conducting preliminary qualitative phytochemical screening, GC-MS phytochemical screening, and estimation of the total phenolic content, total flavonoids content and in vitro antioxidant activity of P. brazzeana. The study also used MZmine 3-assisted structural annotations using GNPS molecular networking and METLIN platforms. The study afforded significant results.

Molecular docking has gained widespread recognition as an important tool in drug discovery, primarily due to its relatively low cost and the perception of its ease of use. These factors have fueled its growing popularity among researchers. The molecular docking method belongs to the Structure-Based Drug Design (SBDD), typically used to get information on the optimal docked ligand poses to create stable complexes with the target. The widespread medicinal use of the plant under consideration motivated the molecular docking analysis of some molecules identified in the plant sample. In the human body, inflammation is a defense mechanism against infections (Simmons DL, 2006). However, uncontrolled inflammation resulting from chronic diseases like asthma and osteoarthritis can contribute to developing conditions such as multiple sclerosis and diabetic nephropathy (Navarro-González JF, et al., 2011). Through the docking studies of these plant-derived molecules, their potential as anti-inflammatory agents have been unveiled, indicated by their binding characteristics with the specific protein COX-2 (code: 5jw1). COX-2 is an enzyme primarily responsible for initiating inflammation. The results of the molecular docking signify an assuring avenue for further investigation.

Material and Methods

Collection and authentication of plant samples

The root bark of Paropsia brazzeana was collected in a clean plastic bag from Lufwanyama district (13°25ˈ60’’S and 27°45’°0’’ E° in degrees minutes seconds) located in the Copperbelt province of Zambia. The Zambia Forestry Department, Kitwe branch verified and authenticated the freshly collected plant sample. Figure 1shows Paropsia brazzeana Baill in its natural habitat prior to collection.

Paropsia

Figure 1: Plant sample of Paropsia brazzeana Baill

Reagents and instruments

This study used analytical grade chemicals, including sodium nitrate (97%), gallic acid (99.5%), sodium carbonate anhydrous (99.5%), aluminum chloride hexahydrate (99% AR), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, quercetin dihydrate (98%), 1,1-Diphenyl-2-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 99% methanol and sodium hydroxide pellets (97%). The chemicals were purchased from Pallav Chemicals and Solvents Pvt, Ltd, India. The laboratory equipment (Cary Agilent 60 UV-VIS Spectrophotometer) and other laboratory utensils were availed by the Chemistry Department at the Copperbelt University.

Preparation of extract for preliminary phytochemical screening and GC-MS analysis

The root bark extract was prepared using the Soxhlet extraction method, as reported by Bitwell C, et al., 2023. In brief, the freshly collected sample was dried in the shade and ground into a fine powder; 20 g of the ground root bark material was loaded in a thimble and extracted with 250 ml of 98% ethanol. The extracting process was sustained for 10 hours. Once cooled, the extract was filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper and finally concentrated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (Büchi Rotavapour 200). The concentrated extract was then put in a sterile amber glass bottle and preserved in a refrigerator at 4°C in readiness for further analysis.

Preparation of crude extract for the estimation of total phenol content, total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity

Following the procedure described by Bitwell C, et al., 2023 the crude extract for estimating total phenols, total flavonoids, and in vitro antioxidant activities was prepared using the maceration method. For this purpose, 2.0 g of dried root bark sample was macerated with 40 ml of 99% methanol by constantly shaking the mixture for 24 hours at 100 rpm. The extract was finally obtained by filtering the mixture using Whatman No.1 filter paper and stored in sterile amber bottles in readiness for use for the various tests.

Preliminary phytochemical screening

Qualitative phytochemical screening was done following an already established procedure of Rauha JP, et al., 2000 to determine the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, terpenoids, tannins, phenols, steroids, carbohydrates and anthraquinones in methanolic extract of Paropsia brazzeana Baill.

Test for alkaloids (Wagner’s test): To 3 ml of the crude extract in a test tube, 1 ml dilute HCl and Wagner’s reagent was added and shaken vigorously. The appearance of a reddish-brown precipitate indicated the presence of an alkaloid.

Test for saponins (Form test): About 3 ml of ethanolic extract was placed in a test tube to which 5 ml of distilled water was added, shaken vigorously, and allowed to stand for 10 minutes. The appearance of a reasonably stable emulsion indicated the presence of saponins.

Test for flavonoids (Alkaline reagent test): About 3 ml of the ethanolic extract was initially put in a test tube. A further 3 drops of dilute 20% NaOH solution were then added. An intense yellow colour changing to colorless upon adding a few drops of dilute HCl indicated the presence of flavonoids.

Test for phenols and tannins (Braymer’s test): About 3 ml of the ethanolic extract was initially placed in a test tube, and 3 drops of 10% ferric chloride solution were added. The appearance of blue-green precipitation indicated a positive test.

Test for terpenoid (Salkowski test): About 3 ml of chloroform was placed initially in a test tube, and 5 ml of plant extract was added slowly. About four drops of concentrated sulphuric acid were then added to this test tube, and the solution was allowed to stand for a few minutes. The appearance of a reddish color indicated a positive test for terpenoids.

Test for anthraquinone (Borntrager’s test): About 3 ml of chloroform was placed initially in a test tube, and 5 ml of plant extract was added slowly and subsequently filtered. Further, 3 ml of 10% ammonia was then immediately added to the filtrate. A reddish colour indicated the presence of anthraquinones.

Test for steroid: (Salkowski reaction): About 3 ml of chloroform was placed initially in a test tube, and 5 ml of plant extract was added slowly. Some four drops of concentrated sulphuric acid were added to this test tube, and the solution was allowed to stand for a few minutes. The formation of red color indicated a positive test.

Test for carbohydrates (Fehling’s test): A 2 ml of the extract was initially put in a test tube, followed by adding 2 ml of Fehling’s solution. The test tube was then kept in a boiling water bath for 12 minutes. The formation of a red precipitate confirmed the presence of carbohydrates.

GC-MS phytochemical screening

The hyphenated system GC-MS was used to screen for the various bioactive compounds present in the root bark ethanolic extract of Paropsia brazzeana Baill. GC-MS analysis was conducted using Thermo GC-Trace Ultra Ver 5.0, Thermo MS DSQ II (Netherlands). The GC-MS operation used the Electron Ionization system with 70 eV ionization energy. A High-performance GC capillary column (Scion -5MS) consisting of the conditions such as; 30 m column length, 0.25 mm diameter (narrow bore), a film of 0.25 µm, and temperature limits of -60°C to 350 °C was used. Helium (99.99%) was used as carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/ min and an injection volume of 1 µl. The injector type, S/SL, was set at a temperature of 250°C with a hold time of 20 min with a split ratio of 10:1. Autosampler (8400) and a micro syringe of size 10 µl was used. The oven temperature was initially programmed to run isothermally from 80°C for 3 min, followed by a systematic increase of 10.0°C/min to 300°C for a total GC running time of 34.00 minutes. The phytochemicals in the targeted sample were identified based on comparing their Retention Time (RT) (min) and mass spectral patterns with the spectral database in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) library (NIST, 2023).

Estimation of Total Flavonoid Content (TFC): The total flavonoid content in the root bark extracts of Paropsia brazzeana was determined by the aluminum chloride colorimetric assay as described by Zhishen J, et al., 1999. The quercetin solution to generate the calibration curve was prepared following the protocol reported by Zhishen J, et al., 1999. In brief, a stock solution of quercetin was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of it in 100 ml methanol and serially diluting it to make solutions of various concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80, 100 µg/ml). From each type of solution, 100 µl was put in 10 ml volumetric flasks, followed by adding 4 ml of distilled water. At the same time, 0.3 ml of 5% NaNO2 was added. After 5 minutes, 0.3 ml of 10% AlCl3 was added to the mixtures. Finally, after 6 minutes, 2 ml of 1 M NaOH was added to the mixtures, followed by the addition of distilled water up to the mark. The absorbance was then measured at 510 nm against the blank using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Agilent, Cary 60). A stock solution of the extract was initially prepared by diluting 1 ml of concentrated extract in 49 ml methanol. 0.2 ml was pipetted from the stock solution into three 10 ml volumetric flasks. These extracts were then subjected to similar conditions as the standard quercetin solution prepared earlier. The total flavonoid content was obtained via the calibration curve and expressed as mg of Quercetin Equivalent (QE) per g.

Estimation of Total Phenol Content (TPC): The total phenolic content in the root bark extracts of Paropsia brazzeana was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method as outlined by Singleton VL, et al., 1999. The preparation of gallic acid solution for the calibration curve was done, as reported by Singleton VL, et al., 1999. In brief, a stock solution of gallic acid was initially prepared by dissolving 100 mg of Gallic acid into 100 ml methanol. This solution was then serially diluted to various concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80, 100 µg/ml). To 1 ml of each of these solutions, 5 ml of 10% Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent (FCR) and 4 ml of 7.5% Na2CO3 were added, making a final volume of 10 ml. The mixture was shaken well and incubated for 90 minutes at room temperature for the reaction to complete. The absorbance was then measured at 765 nm against the blank using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Agilent, Cary 60). A stock solution of the extract was initially prepared by diluting 1 ml of concentrated extract in 49 ml methanol. 0.2 ml was pipetted from the stock solution into three 10 ml volumetric flasks. These extracts were then subjected to similar conditions as the standard gallic acid solution earlier prepared. The total phenol content obtained was expressed as mg of Gallic Acid Equivalent (GAE) per g.

DPPH radical scavenging assay

The free radical scavenging is commonly determined by applying 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picryl-Hydrazyl-Hydrate (DPPHH) method. DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined using a method described by Brand-williams V, et al., 1995. The DPPH test is a quick and easy way to test an antioxidant potential (Baliyan S, et al., 2022).

Preparation of DPPH solution: The DPPH solution was prepared by dissolving its 4 mg in 100 ml of 99% methanol. It was then stored in a cool and dark place after being wrapped in aluminum foil. The Control was prepared by mixing 1 ml DPPH solution and 1 ml methanol. Appropriate volumes were then transferred to a cuvette and absorbance measured at 517 nm against the blank (methanol).

Preparation of ascorbic acid standard solution: The preparation of ascorbic acid needed to determine a calibration curve was done in a manner similar to Brand-williams V, et al., 1995. Briefly, a stock solution of ascorbic acid was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of ascorbic acid in 100 ml distilled water. This solution was then serially diluted to have different concentrations of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 µg/ml using 99% methanol. In 10 ml volumetric flasks (volumes of 1,2,3,4,5 ml of 20 to 100 µg/ml concentrations respectively were pipetted out. 3 ml of DPPH was then added to each flask, and the solution was made to 10 ml with methanol. The mixtures were then incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes in the dark for the reaction to complete. The absorbance of each solution was measured using a Carey 60 Agilent spectrophotometer at 517 nm against the blank (methanol). The sample extracts were also treated under similar conditions as ascorbic acid. The Percentage of Inhibition (I%) was determined using the following formula as per Phuyal N, et al., 2020.

I%=AC-AS/AC × 100

Where, AC=Absorbance of the Control, AS=Absorbance of the Sample solution, and I%=Percentage of Inhibition (Phuyal N, et al., 2020).

Molecular docking

Preparation of ligands: The Structured Data File (SDF) file of 3D structures of selected molecules such as (E)-3,3’-dimethoxy-4-4’-dihydroxystilbene (L1), 2,5-diphenyl oxazole (L2), Beta-Sitosterol (L3) identified in the study plant sample and reference drug molecule Ibuprofen (R) were downloaded from PubChem. They were prepared using Avogadro 1.2.0 software by adding hydrogens and optimizing the geometry to lead to a mol2 file, which was subsequently converted to a pdbqt file by choosing torsions and selecting active bonds using autodock 4.2 tools.

Receptor preparation: COX-2 is a critical enzyme in the inflammatory process, primarily responsible for synthesizing prostaglandins, crucial lipid signaling molecules involved in various physiological processes, including inflammation. In our study, we selected COX-2 as the receptor of interest. The crystal structure of the protein complex used in this study was acquired from the Protein Data Bank at www.rcsb.org/pdb.pdb. Downloaded protein was processed using ChimeraX software by deleting nonstandard atoms and bonds from the residue and selected chain and, subsequently, using autodock 4.2 tools, deleting water, adding hydrogens, merging nonpolar hydrogens, adding Collman charges, and assigning AD4 type atoms to generate PDBQT file.

Docking procedure

The grid parameters were set by modifying the dimensions of X, Y, and Z to 126. Gpf files were generated from ligand and protein pdbqt files using autodock 4.2 tools to carry out autogrid run. Dpf files were created from ligand and protein pdbqt files using autodock 4.2 by setting genetic algorithms to 70 runs to achieve desired conformations, accepting default docking parameters, and selecting Lamarckian genetic algorithm with 2500000 energy evaluations. In order to get the desired conformations, 70 runs were carried out. Further, autogrid and autodock runs were executed. The docking results were retrieved from glg files.

Results and Discussion

Qualitative preliminary phytochemical screening

Plants are known for synthesizing a broad spectrum of secondary metabolites. Some of them can be very complex and difficult to synthesize in lab. Secondary metabolites are useful to humans as flavourants, dyes, pesticides, antioxidants and pharmaceuticals (Ochatt S, et al., 2022). There is considerable focus globally on finding medicinal compounds from plant sources. Researchers worldwide are engaged in exploring bioactive compounds from medicinal plants (Fierascu RC, et al., 2018). There are several classes of phytocompounds. The preliminary phytochemical screening of Paropsia brazzeana Baill root bark revealed the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, phenols, tannins, terpenoids, and steroids, as depicted in Table 1.

Phytochemical class Outcomesa
Alkaloids (1)  +
Saponins (2) -
Flavonoids (3) +
Phenols (4)   +
Tannins (5) +
Terpenoids (6) +
Steroids (7)  +
Carbohydrates (8) +
Anthroquinones (9) -

Table 1: Results of qualitative phytochemical screening of root extract of Paropsia brazzaeana Baill

GC-MS phytochemical proflling

GC-MS phytochemical profiling using NIST library revealed the presence of several significant compounds such as D-allose, vanillic acid, 2,5-diphenyl-oxazole, linoelaidic acid, beta-sitosterol, and many more. Table 2 shows some compounds along with their spectral characteristics identified from NIST library. The GC-MS generated chromatogram is depicted in Figure 2.

S.no RT Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) number Compound name Molecular weight Molecular formula Molecular structure
1 5.639 16326-98-0 1,3-Cyclopentaediol,-trans 102 C5H10O2 Equation
2 8.077 28564-83-2 4H-Pyran-one,2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydro-6-methyl- 144 C6H8O4 Equation
3 8.554 6973-60-0 N-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylic acid 125 C6H7NO2 Equation
4 9.512 67-47-0 5-Hydromethylfurfural 126 C6H6O3 Equation
5 11.061 91-10-1 Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy- 154 C8H10O3 Equation
6 11.127 97-53-0 Eugenol 164 C10H12O2 Equation
7 11.491 3856-25-5 Copaene 204 C15H24 Equation
8 11.63 629-62-9 Pentadecane 212 C15H32 Equation
9 12.129 87-44-5 Caryophyllene 204 C15H2 Equation
10 13.667 2595-97-3 D-Allose 180 C6H12O6 Equation
11 14 121-34-6 Vanillic acid 168 C8H8O4 Equation
12 14.121 630-04-6 Hentriacontane 436 C31H64 Equation
13 14.204 6627-88-9 Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy-4-(2-propenyl)- 194 C11H14O3 Equation
14 15.194 1367364-78-0 4-Hydroxy-2-methylpyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid 145 C6H11NO3 Equation
15 15.487 13096-31-6 5-Hydroxypipecolic acid 145 C6H11NO3 Equation
16 15.751 4899-74-5 2-propanone, 1-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl 196 C10H12O4 Equation
17 16.099 19037-58-2 Syringylacetone 210 C11H14O4 Equation
18 16.346 629-92-5 Nonadecane 268 C19H4O Equation
19 16.743 530-57-4 Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy- 198 C9H10O5 Equation
20 17.069 84-69-5 1,2-Benzenediccarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester 278 C16H22O4 Equation
21 18.037 57-10-3 n-Hexadecanoic acid 256 C16H32O2 Equation
22 18.3 18281-05-5 Eicosanoic acid, ethyl ester 340 C22H44O2 Equation
23 18.365 629-92-5 Nonadecane 268 C19H4O Equation
24 18.973 92-71-7 Oxazole, 2,5-diphenyl- 221 C15H11NO Equation
25 19.202 36653-82-4 1-Hexadecanol 242 C16H34O Equation
26 19.739 2416-19-5 Cis-7-Hexadecenoic acid 254 C16H30O2 Equation
27 19.911 112-80-1 Oleic acid 282 C18H34O2 Equation
28 20.2 630-04-6 Hentriacontane 436 C31H64 Equation
29 20.455 506-21-8 Linoelaidic acid 280 C18H32O2 Equation
30 21.688 301-02-0 9-Octadecananide, (Z)- 281 C18H35NO Equation
31 21.878 124-26-5 Octadecananide 283 C18H37NO Equation
32 22.864 23470-00-0 Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester 330 C19H38O4 Equation
33 23.016 117-81-7 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)Phthalate 390 C24H38O4 Equation
34 23.327 10417-94-4 Cis-5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoic acid 302 C20H30O2 Equation
35 24.156 7329-69-3 (E)-3,3’-dimethoxy-4-4’-dihydroxystilbene 272 C16H16O4 Equation
36 24.243 7459-33-8 9,12-Octadecadienoyl Chloride, (Z,Z)- 298 C18H31ClO Equation
37 25.037 111-02-4 Squalene 410 C30H50 Equation
38 30.712 83-46-5 Beta-Sitosterol 414 C29H50O Equation

Table 2: Tentative phytocompounds identified in Paropsia brazzaeana root bark ethanolic extracts

chromatogram

Figure 2: GC-MS generated chromatogram of Paropsia brazzeana root

Bioactive compounds have been known to exert pharmacological properties. For instance, D-Allose (D-All), a D-glucose stereoisomer (Shintani T, et al., 2019). has been reported to partially reduce the production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) emanating from the mitochondria and ATP (Murata A, et al., 2003). Free radicals have been implicated in development of various health conditions as a result of oxidative stress (Angelova PR, et al., 2021). Studies have also indicated that the suppression of ROS production in mitochondria is a vital step in the protection of hypertension and inhibition of ischemic diseases at the individual level (Nazarewicz RR and Dikalov SI, 2013). Similarly, in a preclinical mouse model D-All administered orally reduced the development of Bladder Cancer (BC) by potentially upregulating Thyoredoxin-Interacting Protein (TXNIP) expression while having an effect on intracellular generation of oxygen reactive species (Tohi Y, et al., 2022).

According to Kaur J, et al., 2021, Vinillic acid exerts far more pharmacologic effects other than the traditional flavouring role it has been appreciated for. For example, it has shown to have anticancer, antidiabetic, anti-obesity, antifungal, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative properties while also easing cramps and thus it can be used as a potential nutraceutical (Bin Sayeed MS, et al., 2016).

On the other hand, beta-sitosterol a plant phytosterol has shown ability to suppress or reduce the Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol amounts which the body takes in (Baskar AA, et al., 2010). In a certain in vivo preclinical trial involving male rats, beta-sitosterol obtained from Asclepias curassavica managed to slow down proliferation of human colon cancer cells. Ayaz M, et al., 2017 showed in vitro studies of beta-sitosterol to be a strong antioxidant and as well as having anticholinesterase properties, though the potency was less compared to standard drugs (Hwang HJ, et al., 2006).

GNPS annotated phytocompounds

The initial step involved converting raw GC-MS data into an MZML file and then processing it on the MZmine 3 platform to produce Mascot Generic Format (MGF) and Comma-Separated Values (CSV) files from the MZML data (Schmid R, et al., 2023). Subsequently, these files were uploaded to the GNPS molecular networking platform for the identification of multiple molecules, as described in Table 3. The details of the multifarious information regarding identified molecules are accessible through the link (https://gnps.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/status.jsp?task=a0aa90abbe694c989555a7a48540ef69).

S.no Compound name Cosine similarity Class Shared peaks
1 Spermine 0.95 Gold 6
2 L-Norvaline 0.8 Gold 7
3 Thiosulphate 0.79 Gold 6
4 Naphthalene, 1-phenyl- 0.79 Gold 6
5 Isoeugenol   0.78 Gold 6
5 Trans-Isoeugenol 0.75 Gold 6
6 (+-)-4-Hydroxy-alpha-(1-(methylamino)ethyl)benzyl alcohol 0.75 Gold 6
7 Linoleic acid methyl ester 0.74 Gold 6
8 Oxine-copper 0.74 Gold 7
9 4-Butoxybenzoic acid trimethylsilyl ester 0.72 Gold 7
10 Naphthalene 0.72 Gold 8
11 N,N-Diphenyl-p-toluenesulfonamide 0.71 Gold 6
12 4,8,14,15,15-Pentamethylbicyclo[9.3.1]pentadeca-4(E),8(E),14-triene 0.71 Gold 7
13 Pentadecafluorooctanoic acid, undecyl ester 0.68 Gold 6
14 Alpha-bisabolene    0.66 Gold 6
15 Procaine 0.66 Gold 6
16 Hexanamide, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N-isobutyl- 0.64 Gold 6
17 2-Cynoethyl-6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran   0.63 Gold 8
18 Ethyl N-(4-amino-6-methyl-2-pyrimidinyl)anthranilate 0.63 Gold 6
19 Fiehn VocBinbase Bin #502 0.62 Gold 6
20 Propionamide, 3-cyclopentyl-N-methyl-N-(hept-2-yl)- 0.62 Gold 6
21 Benzo[ghi]perylene 0.62 Gold 6
22 Diethyl 2-formylsuccinate    0.61 Gold 6
23 Fiehn VocBinbase Bin #481 0.6 Gold 6
24 Cycloleucine 0.6 Gold 6
25 Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 4-methoxy-, tridecyl ester 0.6 Gold 6
26 4-Acetamido-N,N-dicyclohexyl-3-nitrobenzamide 0.6 Gold 8
27 1H-Imidazole, 2-heptadecyl-4,5-dihydro- 0.59 Gold 6
28 Methyl dihydrojasmonate (cis) 0.59 Gold 6
29 Tetrasiloxane, decamethyl- 0.58 Gold 6
30 Dibutoxyethyl Sebacate    0.58 Gold 6
31 Methyl 3-methyl-6-oxo-2-thioxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-1,3-oxazine-4-carboxylate 0.58 Gold 6
32 1-Ethyl-2-undecylimidazole 0.57 Gold 6
33 3-Bromo-7-methylbenzo(b)thiophene 0.57 Gold 6
34 Aspartyllysine 0.57 Gold 6
35 9-Methyl-4-oxo-4H-pyrido(1,2-A)pyrimidine-3-acetic acid ethyl ester  0.56 Gold 6
36 1-Methyl-3-phenylindole 0.56 Gold 6
37 2-(p-Acetylanilino)tropone 0.56 Gold 6
38 2,4,6-Trimethyl-4'-phenyldiphenylsulfone 0.56 Gold 6
39 Isopropyl tetradecanoate 0.55 Gold 6
40 1,1,2-Ethanetricarboxylic acid, triethyl ester 0.55 Gold 6
41 1-(1-Isobutoxyethyl)-4,4-dimethyl-2,5-dioxoimidazolidine 0.55 Gold 6
42 Benzene, 1,3,5-trichloro- 0.54 Gold 6
43 5-Chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid 0.53 Gold 6
44 9-(Dicyanomethylene)fluorene 0.53 Gold 6
45 Copper 8-hydroxyquinolate 0.53 Gold 7
46 Fiehn VocBinbase Bin #757 0.52 Gold 6
47 4-Chloro-2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylpyrimidine   0.52 Gold 6
48 3,4-Methylenedioxyphenyl acetone 0.52 Gold 6
49 Caffeine 0.51 Gold 6
50 Glutaric acid, 3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl but-3-en-1-yl ester 0.51 Gold 6
51 Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 4-butyl-, 4-methoxyphenyl ester 0.51 Gold 6
52 (3-Pyridyl)methyloctadecanoate   0.51 Gold 6

Table 3: List of annotated molecules from Feature Based Molecular Networking (FBMN) in GNPS

Molecules mined from METLIN Gen 2

Raw GC-MC data were converted into mzML file which was subsequently processed using MZmine 3 to have MGF and Quantification table. The MGF file was subjected to METLIN Gen2 to mine metabolites. The metabolites found are depicted in Table 4. The structures of the metabolites sourced from METLIN Gen 2 are depicted in Figure 3.

S. no Compound name Molecular weight Molecular formula
1 2-Amino-2-(hydromethyl)-propane-1,3-diol 121.0739 C4H11NO3
2 2-Pyrrolidine-5-carboxylic acid, methyl ester 143.0582 C6H9NO3
3 Ethylenediamine 60.0687 C2H8N3
4 2,6-Diamino-1H-1,3,5-triazin-4-one 127.0494 C3H5N5O
5 Methyl(2S)-4-hydroxypyrrolidine-2-carboxylate 145.0739 C6H11NO3
6 Methyl aminoevulinate 145.0766 C6H11NO3
7 1H-indole-4-methane 145.0766 C9H9N2
8 6-methylpyrimidine-4,5-diol 126.043 C5H6N2O2
9 4-hydroxy-2-methyl-1H-pyrimidin-6-one 126.043 C5H6N2O2
10 6-methyluracil 126.0429 C5H6N2O2
11 Amidazoleacetic acid 126.0429 C5H6N2O2
12 Thymine 126.0429 C5H6N2O2
13 5-Methyl-2-furancaboxylic acid 126.0317 C6H6O3
14 Dimethylmaleic acic anhydride 126.0317 C6H6O3
15 Allomaltol 126.0317 C6H6O3
16 5-(hydroxymethyl)furan-2-carbaldehyde 126.0317 C6H6O3
17 Benzene-1,2,5-triol 126.0317 C6H3O3
18 Benzene-1,2,3-triol 126.0317 C6H6O3
19 4-hydroxyl-6-methylpyran-2-one 126.0317 C6H6O3
20 3-hydroxy-2-methylpyran-4-one 126.0317 C6H6O3
21 Benzene-1,2,4-triol 126.0317 C6H6O3
22 1-Ethyl-3-(prop-2-en-1-yl)thiourea 144.072 C6H12N2S
23 3-Aminoquinolin 144.0687 C9H8N2

Table 4: Hit list of compounds in Paropsia brazzeana root bark identified in METLIN Gen2 (Mass Consortium Corporation) tools

Antioxidant

Figure 3: Antioxidant activity of Paropsia brazzeana root bark methanolic extract

Total phenol content

Phenolics have previously been recognized for their wide-ranging health benefits, including antiulcer, antimicrobial, antiatherogenic, anticancer, antithrombotic, antiallergic, antidiabetic, and others (Ogasawara M, et al., 2007; Tyśkiewicz K, et al., 2018; Liu L, et al., 2004; Panche AN, et al., 2016). Total phenolic content in Paropsia brazzeana root bark extract was determined using a calibration curve (y=0.01368x+0.15211, R2=0.99188) with gallic acid as a reference (Figure 2). The results were expressed as the mass equivalent of Gallic Acid (GAE) per kilogram of the sample, yielding a value of 527.0565 ± 0.8704 mg GAE/kg of the sample. The presence of phenols in P. brazzeana root bark may explain its effectiveness in treating various ailments, consistent with the traditional use by local communities. These phytochemicals have been previously documented in the literature for their efficacy in managing various health conditions.

Total flavonoid content

Flavonoids are regarded as crucial phytochemicals due to their wide range of applications in cosmetic, pharmacological and nutraceutical industry (Özkök A, et al., 2010). The total flavonoid content was determined with the aid of a calibration curve (y=0.0007x+0.1233, R2=0.9987) with quercetin as reference, as depicted in Figure 3. The results indicated a total flavonoid content of 587.15 ± 2.2768 QE/kg of sample expressed as mass of quercetin equivalent.

Antioxidant activity of Paropsia brazzeana root bark methanolic extract

The antioxidant scavenging potential of Paropsia brazzeana Baill root bark extract was determined using DPPH assay (Brand-Williams W, et al., 1995). The results showed that the percetage radical scavenging activity increased with an increase in concentrations (Figure 4), which is in accordance with previous reported literature. The % radical scavenging activity was found to be 29.67, 45.03, 61.78, 69.77, 75.07% at 20-100 mg/l. The IC50 value which shows the concentration needed to scavenge 50% DPPH free radicals was found to be 42.37 mg/l while for standard ascorbic acid it was 23.19 mg/l. According to Molyneux (2004) a potential antioxidant having an IC50 value less than 50 mg/l is classified to be stronger (Molyneux P, 2004). A lower IC50 value indicates that a smaller concentration of the substance is required to achieve a 50% reduction in the measured oxidative activity or damage. In the case of antioxidants, a lower IC50 value suggests a more potent antioxidant effect. The DPPH solution is reduced to DPPH-H when antioxidants containing polyphenols or phenolics are present or due to an increase in number of electrons present (Aberoumand A and Deokule SS, 2008). The radical scavenging capability or potential of Paropsia brazzeana Baill root bark extract could thus be as a result of the presence of polyphenolic compounds, which have previously been reported to have free radical terminating potential.

Paropsia

Figure 4: DPPH radical assay activity of ascorbic acid vs. Paropsia brazzeana Baill root bark extract Note: Equation

Molecular docking results

Table 5provides a visual representation of binding sites between the target protein and the selected compounds, highlighting the specific residues that are capable of forming molecular interactions. The interaction analysis using discovery studio between ligands and receptor is stipulated. The complex formation between L1 with COX-2 (code: 5jw1) (Figure 5 A-C) include conventional hydrogen bonds (SER 127), carbon hydrogen bonds (LEU 532, ARG 121, PRO 529), pi-cations (LYS 353), alkyl and pi alkyls (TYR 123, MET 536 LEU 118, PHE 372) and many van der waals interaction. Similarly complex between L2 and COX-2 (code: 5jw1) comprises pi-sigma (VAL 524, LEU 353), pi-sulfur (MET 523), pi-pi T-shaped (TRP 588) and several Van der Waals interactions. Further complex between L3 and COX-2 (code: 5jw1) include conventional hydrogen bonds (LYS 469, ASN 43), alkyl (ARG 44, CYS 36 PRO 154) and some van der waals interaction. These interactions attribute to stable ligand receptor complexes. Furthermore, complex formation between R (Ibuprofen) and COX-2 (code: 5jw1) involve conventional hydrogen bonds (GLN 373, LYS 533, GLN 371), alkyl and pi-alkyl (ARG 121, LEU 532, ILE 125) interactions. These bond interaction collectively enables a cohesive complex formation.

Ligand Residue Interactions
(E)-3,3’-Dimethoxy-4-4’-dihydroxystilbene (L1) LYS 353 Pi-cation
SER 127 Conventional hydrogen bonds
LEU 532, ARG 121, PRO 529 Carbon hydrogen bonds
TYR 123, MET 536, LEU 118, PHE 372 Alkyl and pi-alkyls
2,5-Diphenyl oxazole (L2) MET 523 Pi-sulfur
TRP 588 Pi-pi T-shaped
VAL 524, LEU 353 Pi-Sigma
Beta-sitosterol (L3) LYS 469, ASN 43 Conventional hydrogen bonds
ARG 44, CYS 36, PRO 154 Alkyl
Ibuprofen (R) GLN 373, LYS 533, GLN 371 Conventional hydrogen bonds
ARG 121, LEU 532, ILE 125 Alkyls and pi-alkyls

Table 5: Binding complexes between plant compounds (ligands) and 5jw1 receptor depicted in 2D and 3D

ligands

Figure 5: 2D complexes of ligands and 5jw1 receptor (A): L1 (B): L2 (C): L3 Note: Equation Equation

The current study demonstrates strong binding affinities of selected compounds derived from the root of Paropsia brazzeana Baill root. Specifically, ligands L1, L2, and L3 exhibited notable binding energies of -6.28 kcal/ mole, -7.71 kcal/mole, and -11.43 kcal/mole, respectively (Table 6). These values are comparable to the binding energy observed for Ibuprofen, which is -6.88 kcal/mole as shown in Table 6. Moreover, the inhibition constants for L1, L2, and L3 are 25.12 µM, 2.25 µM, and 4.18 nM, respectively, indicating a similarity to the inhibition constant of Ibuprofen, which is 9.10 µM (Table 6). Using computational techniques can speed up the process of finding and creating new medicines (Khandelwal A, et al., 2007). Based on docking analysis, it was found that beta-sitosterol (L3) can firmly attach to the COX-2 receptor with a powerful binding energy of -11.43 kcal/mole and a low inhibition constant of 4.18 nM. Therefore, beta-sitosterol could be a promising candidate for making a new anti-inflammatory drug.

Ligand Binding energy (Kcal/mole) Inhibition constant (µM) Total internal energy (kcal/mol) Torsional free energy (kcal/mol) Unbound energy (kcal/mol) Cluster RMSD
L1 -6.28 25.12 -1.38 1.79 -1.38 0
L2 -7.71 2.25 -0.45 0.6 -0.45 0
L3 -11.43 4.18 -1.04 2.09 -1.04 0
R (Ibuprofen) -6.88 9.10 -0.45 1.49 -0.45 0

Table 6: Docking analysis of selected ligands from Paropsia brazeana Baill root with COX-2 enzyme

Conclusion

The preliminary screening tests on the root bark extract of Paropsia brazzeana Baill showed that it contained various beneficial compounds like alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, tannins, terpenoids, carbohydrates, and steroids. These compounds are known for their positive effects in treating different health issues. Moreover, the methanolic root bark extract was found to have high levels of polyphenols and strong antioxidant abilities, as shown by the IC50 value. Polyphenols are known to act as powerful tools against harmful molecules in the body. This suggests that Paropsia brazzeana Baill’s root bark could be a valuable source of natural compounds beneficial to health.

Furthermore, the docking analysis study indicated that some specific compounds from the plant extract have promising properties. Among them, Beta-Sitosterol showed the most favorable binding energy and inhibition constant. This suggests that Beta-Sitosterol could be a potential candidate for further research to develop a new and promising anti-inflammatory medicine.

Acknowledgement

The authors express their profound gratitude to The Copperbelt University (CBU).

References

Author Info

Indra Sen Singh* and Sidney Muzyamba
 
Department of Chemistry, School of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zimbabwe
 

Citation: Singh IS: GC-MS, GNPS and METLIN Assisted Phytochemical Profiling, Bioactivity Study and Molecular Docking Analysis of Paropsia brazzeana Root Bark, a Medicinal Plant in Zambia

Received: 18-Dec-2023 Accepted: 02-Jan-2024 Published: 10-Jan-2024, DOI: 10.31858/0975-8453.15.1.1-14

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Most Viewed Articles
  • Dental Development between Assisted Reproductive Therapy (Art) and Natural Conceived Children: A Comparative Pilot Study Norzaiti Mohd Kenali, Naimah Hasanah Mohd Fathil, Norbasyirah Bohari, Ahmad Faisal Ismail, Roszaman Ramli SRP. 2020; 11(1): 01-06 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2020.1.01
  • Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of life instrument, short form: Validity in the Vietnamese healthcare context Trung Quang Vo*, Bao Tran Thuy Tran, Ngan Thuy Nguyen, Tram ThiHuyen Nguyen, Thuy Phan Chung Tran SRP. 2020; 11(1): 14-22 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1.3
  • A Review of Pharmacoeconomics: the key to “Healthcare for All” Hasamnis AA, Patil SS, Shaik Imam, Narendiran K SRP. 2019; 10(1): s40-s42 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1s.21
  • Deuterium Depleted Water as an Adjuvant in Treatment of Cancer Anton Syroeshkin, Olga Levitskaya, Elena Uspenskaya, Tatiana Pleteneva, Daria Romaykina, Daria Ermakova SRP. 2019; 10(1): 112-117 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1.19
Most Downloaded
  • Dental Development between Assisted Reproductive Therapy (Art) and Natural Conceived Children: A Comparative Pilot Study Norzaiti Mohd Kenali, Naimah Hasanah Mohd Fathil, Norbasyirah Bohari, Ahmad Faisal Ismail, Roszaman Ramli SRP. 2020; 11(1): 01-06 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2020.1.01
  • Manilkara zapota (L.) Royen Fruit Peel: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review Karle Pravin P, Dhawale Shashikant C SRP. 2019; 10(1): 11-14 » doi: 0.5530/srp.2019.1.2
  • Pharmacognostic and Phytopharmacological Overview on Bombax ceiba Pankaj Haribhau Chaudhary, Mukund Ganeshrao Tawar SRP. 2019; 10(1): 20-25 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1.4
  • A Review of Pharmacoeconomics: the key to “Healthcare for All” Hasamnis AA, Patil SS, Shaik Imam, Narendiran K SRP. 2019; 10(1): s40-s42 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1s.21
  • A Prospective Review on Phyto-Pharmacological Aspects of Andrographis paniculata Govindraj Akilandeswari, Arumugam Vijaya Anand, Palanisamy Sampathkumar, Puthamohan Vinayaga Moorthi, Basavaraju Preethi SRP. 2019; 10(1): 15-19 » doi: 10.5530/srp.2019.1.3